“Preserving forests in an urban world” is a good article to help planners preserve forests in urban and suburban areas.
Conservation subdivisions are mentioned as a tool to protect forests and habitat: Conservation subdivisions aim to keep 50-70 percent of a development as open space. These special subdivisions can reduce infrastructure costs for developers and provide flexibility in lot size.
The article states that Steve Allen, a masters student at N.C. State, identified barriers to implementing conservation subdivisions, including:
1. A lack of incentives for developers, which can include tax breaks, density bonuses, expedited permit review process and reduced setback requirements;
I disagree with providing developers with density bonuses and tax breaks for conservation subdivisions. Why? Studies prove that developers will make MORE money with a conservation subdivision than a conventional cookie-cutter subdivision, and it will be less costly and sell faster.
It’s a good article. Learn more
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.



